中新网北京12月1日电 (蒋鲤)加拿大政府近日发布了一份盗窟美国版“印太计谋”，宣称“在存在久了不合的范围，咱们将挑战中国”。

这份26页的计谋文献，不仅大力对中国袭击抹黑，渲染所谓“中国威迫”，更在涉台、涉疆、涉港、人权等问题上粗暴干与中国内务。

之前，美国本质所谓“印太计谋”，美其名曰要和盟友沿途打造解放洞开、联通、焕发、安全、有韧性的“印太”地区，果然认识则是防碍中国，珍重其在该地区的霸权，充斥着冷战思维。

一样，加拿大这份“印太计谋”也充斥着地缘政事颜色和强劲形状偏见，和美国版“印太计谋”如出一辙。不出丑出，这份文献是在为美国掩旗息鼓，突显了其跟班美国防碍和围堵中国的意图。

但连年来，加拿大与印太地区国度经贸合营发扬寥寥，有限的参加使其酬酢方面在该地区更难以酿成影响，妄图通过“印太计谋”增强我方在该地区的话语权，致使“防碍中国”，显得以螳当车。

俄罗斯科学院美国和加拿大商讨所首席商讨员叶莲娜·科姆科娃暗示，加拿大并非亚太地区的深度军事政事参与者，至少当今还不是。它的所谓新计谋最初是为了完成美国的政事做事。

2021年12月，美国驻加拿大大使大卫·科恩刚刚上任就表态称，美国但愿加拿大有一个明确的亚太地区计谋，并细目中国在其中的位置。如今，加版“印太计谋”刚发布，美国驻加大使科恩就在第一本领发声明暗示“自得”，印证了该国际交计谋对美国的隶属地位。

此前，美国总统拜登在所谓“印太地区”推出美日印澳“四方安全对话”、美英澳AUKUS三边安全左券等，而加拿大当作“五眼定约”成员却被抹杀在外。

为了不被美国等盟友边际化，加拿大通过“印太计谋”向美国发出信号，标明它仍然是美国在包括政事、经济等通盘范围抵抗中国的盟友。然则，即便美国也无法绝对和中国脱钩，但加拿大却急于向美国“送人头”，就怕难以获得公正。

加拿大播送公司(CBC)的报道称，该计谋使用了一些“令人骇怪的直白言语”，加拿大政府需要对中国在远东和其他地区的盘算保持“领略的头脑”。

中加之间既莫得要紧好坏毁坏，也莫得地缘政事矛盾，将中国视作威迫可谓自便。中加两边需要对话，而非抵抗。

新增本土确诊病例9例（成都8例，眉山1例）：

境外输入现有确诊病例475例（无重症病例），无现有疑似病例。累计确诊病例20081例，累计治愈出院病例19606例，无死亡病例。

要是加拿大政府真要对中国保持“领略的头脑”，就要安详思考，不被美国意志支配，在对外计谋上争取更多的自主权。秉持冷战思维、煽动集团政事和阵营抵抗的做法不得民意，也例必会伤及本人利益。

　Canada needs independent thinking before imitating U.S. intervention in Indo-Pacific

By John Lee

(ECNS) -- The Canadian government released an Indo-Pacific Strategy imitating the U.S. in which the country stated that “In areas of profound disagreement, we will challenge China.”

The Canadian government slandered China, propagated “the China threat”, and interfered in China’s internal affairs on issues like Taiwan, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and human rights in this 26-page document.

Like the U.S.’ Indo-Pacific Strategy, which claims to build an “open, connected, prosperous, resilient, and secure Indo-Pacific region” but in fact targets China and tries to maintain hegemony in this region, the Canadian edition is also fraught with geopolitical implications and ideological prejudice. It shows Canada is determined to stand with the U.S. to contain China.

However, Canada has made little progress in economic and trade cooperation with the countries in the so-called Indo-Pacific region in recent years and less efforts to maintain diplomatic relations with regional countries, making it hard to reinforce its local influence. Attempts to strengthen its voice in the region through this strategy and even to curb China seems to be overreaching.

Canada is not an experienced participant in military and political affairs in the Asia-Pacific region, at least not yet. Its so-called new strategy seeks first to accomplish the political mission of the U.S., said Elena G. Komkova, leading Researcher of the Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

In December 2021, U.S. Ambassador to Canada David Cohen stated that the U.S. hoped Canada would deploy a clear Asia-Pacific strategy and determine China's position in it as he took office. After the strategy launch, Cohen issued a statement saying "welcome" to it immediately.

Previously, the U.S., Japan, India, and Australia re-launched the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, while the U.S., Britain and Australia announced a security pact dubbed "AUKUS". Canada, a member of the Five Eyes alliance, was excluded from these security partnerships.

Therefore, to avoid marginalization by the U.S. and other allies, it issued the strategy to tell the U.S. it is still reliable in politics, economy, and other fields to resist China. However, even the U.S. can hardly decouple with China. Will an obsequious strategy help the Canadian government gain what it wants?

Using some surprisingly blunt language, the strategy says the Canadian government needs to be "clear-eyed" about China's objectives in the Far East and elsewhere, said a CBC report.

There is no major interest conflicts or geopolitical contradiction between China and Canada so it is absurd to regard China as a threat. Both sides need dialogue, not confrontation.

If the Canadian government really wants to be "clear-eyed" about China, it must think independently and get rid of the will of the U.S. to strive for more independence in foreign strategies.

Adhering to the Cold War mentality and inciting bloc politics or camp confrontation is unpopular欧冠买球, and is bound to hurt its own interests.